Hardspace: Shipbreaker Ship Doctor Patient Missing, Dead Body Found Port Orange, Warrior River Property For Sale Walker County, Articles W

A decision requires further reviews. Author's version of the manuscript of a paper that has been accepted for publication and which may include any author-incorporated changes suggested through the peer review process. [CDATA[> This should state the main question addressed by the research and summarize the goals, approaches, and conclusions of the paper. You should also consider whether there is any in-built bias not nullified by the control experiments. The coatings exhibit remarkable surface-protective performance, including anticorrosion, antifouling, self-healing, anti-icing, and self-cleaning properties. If no news is good news, blank news is great news? After Acceptance. However, if you spot grammatical errors that affect clarity of meaning, then it's important to highlight these. In the previous rounds, an email was received once the status went blank. One of my manuscripts is there for nearly 4 months. In this pandemic situation, it's highly likely that the processing time will delay a bit longer than normal. Two weeks later, the status was updated from "All reviewers Assigned" to "Manuscript under consideration", and four days later, to a blank Stage as shown in yours. After all, you need the context of the whole paper before deciding to reject. For example, one of the reviewers may have accepted the online invitation initially; and let the editor/associate editor know that s/he may have some conflict of interest. Does anyone have any idea why this is happening? A typical manuscript will have the following sections in the following order: Title page (as the first page of the main document) Title should not state a conclusion or pose a question* A. Menu mayberry funeral home lewisburg, tn. Where improvements are needed, a recommendation for major or minor revision is typical. If you are a co-author, you may be able to check the status if you received a co-author verification email, and have logged in to validate your relationship to the . Detailed instructions for article submission for individual journals are available for most Wiley journals along with more information on contact editor information on Wiley Online Library. Authors may make the case that a topic hasn't been investigated in several years and that new research is required. All data that are used to draw conclusions from your study must be available for consideration during the review of your manuscript and available to the larger scientific community following publication in Clinical and Translational Science. If not, say which are not, Write clearly and so you can be understood by people whose first language is not English, Avoid complex or unusual words, especially ones that would even confuse native speakers, Number your points and refer to page and line numbers in the manuscript when making specific comments, If you have been asked to only comment on specific parts or aspects of the manuscript, you should indicate clearly which these are, Treat the author's work the way you would like your own to be treated, Give constructive feedback describing ways that they could improve the research, Keep the focus on the research and not the author. Should the authors consider resubmitting to the same journal after language improvements? Article Types. 2004 14.04.04 1524 -. Is the paper well written? drafted the initial manuscript, revised and finalised the content. This situation is under active review. Marnett, Cohen, Fukushima, Gooderham, Hecht, Rietjens, and Smith interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript. Aims and Scope. Can you just throw some light on the process? Conflict of Interest. The manuscript needs to be revised by the authors before it can possibly be accepted. Are the conclusions consistent with the evidence and arguments presented? under review 12,3 . Many journals don't provide criteria for reviews beyond asking for your 'analysis of merits'. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Current treatments are designed to alleviate the pain by either using . HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. Exposure of dentin tubules due to loss of protective enamel (crown) and cementum (root) tissues as a result of erosion, mechanical wear, gingival recession, etc. Peer Review Comments, Cover Letter And More. 1 INTRODUCTION. The status of under review means that the paper has been sent . Some journals offer the option to recommend rejection with the possibility of resubmission this is most relevant where substantial, major revision is necessary. If you are unsure it may be better to disclose these in the confidential comments section. Often you can't see these until you log in to submit your review. Motivation: The only problem is they do not update you on the status of your manuscript for the moment you submit it, it just stayed at "under consideration", which made us feel that it was still under editorial review. //--> Ritardo Rogito Per Colpa Banca, You may check the journals website to confirm the contact details of the editorial office for any communication. TCE Subject Editors' Areas of Expertise for Submitting Authors The issue under consideration in this paper is a multi-objective optimization problem that uses MGs to determine the production of renewable and non-renewable sources, charge and discharge of electrical and thermal storage, production of auxiliary boilers, and determine the optimal location and size of capacitors. Expect to suggest such amendments - it's rare for a manuscript to pass review with no corrections. [CDATA[> Authors should disclose details of preprint posting, including DOI and licensing terms, upon submission of the manuscript or at any other point during consideration at a Springer Nature . We hypothesize that this response is caused by leaf structural change associated with altered tissue water status; under cold winter conditions, leaves often remove water from their mesophyll cells, preventing intracellular freezing, as ice formation within the cells of the leaves is deadly (Steponkus, 1984; Li & Christersson, 1993; Buchanan et . Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Usually, if there is a desk rejection, it happens quite soon, within the first few days. by highlighting certain parts of an image). When a tree is evaluated that contains only a subset of the taxa in the reference tree, the identification of clades in the subset tree with clades from the reference tree presents a fundamental problem (Goloboff and Pol, 2002; Goloboff, 2005).Often, it is impossible to identify a clade from a partial analysis unequivocally with a single containing clade from the reference tree. If you have submitted a manuscript, you'll be able to log in to Editorial Manager (EM) as the corresponding author to view the status of your submission. Is the evidence they present strong enough to prove their case? B.E.