However, the new tread pattern is more densely packed for better rolling efficiency and taller side knobs are there to really dig into the corners. I was initially running a 2.35 Ikon on the back and while it has a surprising amount of grip, in the fall with the leaves on the ground, I found it lacking in traction when crawling up steep climbs and in the corners. I personally really like to ride this tire out back, be it a 2.2 or 2.35. We received a 292.4 WT in 3C Maxx Terra, which is recommended for all mountain trails from hard pack to loose over hard. Based in Ohio, Zach is now slowly introducing a new generation to cycling and still trying to figure out how to fit the most rides into a busy schedule as a new dad. Center and intermediate treat designs offer moderately good breaking traction, with performance thats neither the best nor the worst in Maxxis line. This is not a tire that you need to worry about blowing the side walls before youve squeezed the last life out of the tread, which is saying something when the tread is as long-lasting as the Ardent. Hopefully, youre not more confused now than before you read this comparison. Prior to that, Zach spent many years in the back of a bicycle shop building and repairing nearly every type of bike, while figuring out how to (occasionally) ride them. I've run the Ardent/Forekaster combo and it was better than a Forekaster on both. In this review, our customer Jordan goes with the Ardent in front and Forekaster in the rear. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. I am having trouble on deciding between the Maxxis Forekaster 2.35 or the Ardents 2.4. Thanks. Ardent - MAXXIS International With 2.6 on the front I run 16 pounds tubeless & 24 rear. The tread has been beefed up a little, and Maxxis now says it's designed for modern short travel trail bikes. The 2 by 2 tread is also relatively squared off, which works to increase traction between your tire and the terrain. Yeah, no 3c was a dealbreaker for me, esp for a damp conditions tyre. The Rekon comes in a few width options as well as two casing options, all with Maxxis 3C rubber to make sure you are getting the most traction from the rubber itself as possible. Ardent does a similar job but a bit better. Calling it a "Goldilocks" tire, Maxxis envisions the new Forekaster as the ideal step between their current XC options and more aggressive trail and enduro tires. I love the Ikons but I really need something on the front with more bite. Part of that, Appleman Bicycles has released the 2XR FIT Crankset, available to buy or to rent, with the aim of helping riders find the perfect crank length, It wasnt until day three of the 23 Sea Otter Classic that Elliot Tanner, the Founder/CEO of Stashed finally flagged me down to show me. Hooks up nicely in most terrain. Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. They are available in a 2.4 as well, but not in Australia at present. Run the same tire front and rear, run the same tread but large volume up front, or what most of us at Worldwide do: run a more aggressive front tire with a faster rolling rear tire so you can let it slide out back while being in control up front. Grippy compound. Schwalbes have good grip and weight but tend to suck for durability and price. That thicker design also provides greater longevity in the Minion. The Ikon excels in dry conditions with its 3C compound options and the small siping on each knob across the tire. Thick branches can be a similar problem if your tire hits them pointy-end first. I will start with the faster rolling, smaller tread tires and continue into the heavier, knobbier tires that tend to have more traction. Forekaster being light filled a nice gap. Width options range from 2.4 to 2.6 and Wide Trail offerings. I think you are on the right track. Looks like Ill be looking towards their more XC-orientated models next time, which is a shame as I like the larger side knobles than is typical for a light tyre. The Maxxis Forekaster is a bit more of a rarity to see, being the go-to Maxxis XC tire for very loose soil or mud. Theres also very little tuck under risk with the Forekaster, even with the most aggressive out of saddle pedaling, challenging terrain, or now. While XC tires might not get much love from us, we do ride most of them and also sell lots of them. That center tread is fantastic for good rolling resistance. While the Maxxis DHRII might be considered to be an all-mountain/enduro/downhill tire, it provides a great grip to weight ratio when it's in the 2.3 widths and EXO protection. Swapping out a DHF/Dissector but intrigued about the potential of having a potential shoulder season combo of Dissector/forekaster!!!!!!!! The inner tread is relatively short, though still a good bit taller than the tread on a road bike. Looking for some rubber with bite? I have been a writer for nigh on 20 years, a photographer for 25 years and a mountain biker for 30 years. I'm not sure it's 'that' much slower than the Minion SS. Ardent tires are also relatively puncture-resistant, and unlikely to give way even on cheese grater rocks and other difficult terrain. Ride the fastest tires you feel confident on. The new Forekaster does appear to make more sense in the Maxxis range. This is a comparison of the Ardent versus some other fast rolling tires, albeit all in a narrower width as this comparison was for XC oriented tires: There was an interview of a Maxxis marketing guy on NSMB, he openly stated that he doesn't like the Ardent at all and there are better options from maxxis that do the same job better (Recon). An Aspen is never enough in the front, and if it is, then you should be riding a gravel bike. Currently, the Forekaster is only available in 29in. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community. The number of options is a bit crazy to list as well, from different compounds, casing options, and widths, as well as the option to go non-tubeless. Thick outside knobs really hold up to hard cornering and the rolling resistance is pretty good for a more aggressive tire. Would you have this front with a dissector rear? Review: Maxxis's New Forekaster Tire is Heavier & Better - Pinkbike The Forekaster will look like the offspring of the Ardent and Shorty tiresto many people with its open tread spacing and aggressive knobs. Earlier this year, the 2.6 Maxxis Forekaster won me over for its proficient, playful, and predictable mannerisms. For the rear, I opted for something a little lighter that I thought might be more likely to give it up in fast tight turns. Maxxis Forekaster (2017) Tire - Reviews, Comparisons, Specs - Vital MTB I would not consider this the typical XC tire unless your typical XC race is the Downieville Classic where 3k feet of climbing is followed by 30mph+ descents. And a digital membership where you can read all the digital magazines is normally 25, and now 12.50 with the code. Whats the Maxxis equivalent of Schwalbe Magic Mary and Nobby Nic For example, when I started riding in Colorado I was happy with a Ground Control front and a Fast Trak rear but I was also slooow. For fast hardpack punctuated by loose, dry sections, the Dissector has few equals. The EXO construction is well worth the slight weight penalty and is easily offset by not having to carry tubes. And, to be frank, all I have is photographs to go off. I'd say try both and see which one you like for where and how you ride. Lately though, it seems to have really exploded. The Ride Concepts Womens Vice shoes are my current favourite flat pedal shoe, so I wanted to give the Mid version, with raised ankle, a go. While there are a huge number of choices from Maxxis, we have picked out our favorite models and the combinations that we love to ride them in. The Forekaster weighs only 735g with dual compound and EXO sidewall protection. The very photos here. New Maxxis Forekaster: goodbye to damp, hello to downcountry? For trail riders who don't want to lug around heavy enduro tires but still want plenty of traction, the new Forekaster gets itright. We only had one small gripe with the tyre in that we had to use a bit more sealant than we were used to prevent them losing air during the ride. Fast rolling, slidey in the corners, slippy on the rocks. Overall the Maxxis Ardent is still a solid choice of tire, reasonably affordable for its performance, and offering very low roll resistance and good longevity. A lot of people are running Dissectors up front on downcountry / short travel bikes, myself included. Anything more and that goes into the next category of tires. The grip afforded by the Trail Kings got better with a bit of trail time, the tyres losing their coating and the knobs becoming more pliable (but still supportive). The internal, smaller, tread is even more durable. This is another tire set that is often used together, but the Forekaster is a slightly looser, slightly faster option that adapts to aggressive riding styles somewhat better than the Ardent. The tread isnt aggressive enough for thick loose soil or sandy conditions, and quickly loses traction in those conditions. Hopefully can get my hands on one! That brand reputation should definitely be considered when youre looking for a great tire since it comes with better assurances that the tire has actually been built to do what it says it can do. Would run as a rear though. Cotic RocketMAXer. A nippy tyre for modest trail bikes. The forekaster has surprisingly good grip for it's weight, and it performs well in a wide range of conditions (dry loose over hard all the way to slightly greasy clay) but it is no doubt, a reduced rolling resistance xc/trail tire. A forum is a difficult place to get helpful information on tires. The Forekaster rolls ok / brakes ok and actually it does a pretty good job when its wet. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Overall a well mannered tyre and a better choice for those whose trail choice is more rocky road than caramel slice. The result is a tire that blends low rolling resistance . The Fora platform includes forum software by XenForo. Maxxis might have some of the most iconic XC/Trail tires like the Ikon and Ardent. Forekaster are great all around tires, Adrdents are still ok tires IMO but honestly since riding 2.35 Forekaster and 2.4 Rekons I cant ever see riding an arent again either. In 30 years, this will probably be the first time I plan to replace the worn out rear tire with an identical tire. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. I had a funny feeling that mentioning Ardents would draw some very good responses. We have one guy ion our group that tried them on his Ripley and ditched them after 2-3 rides. Use as a front paired with an Aspen or Ikon rear for an "aggressive" XC setup. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. The previous tire in 292.35 size was quoted at 745g. I'm a big fan of Maxxis and find all their tires to be reliable. Great control under braking with L shaped side knobs allow some confident riding for a tire that rolls this fast. I know that Maxx Terra tire wore phenomenally well though compared to the Maxx Speed after almost 400 miles the knobs are still sharp and pronounced and look brand new. New to the Maxxis mountain bike tire lineup a couple of years ago, the Aggressor has quickly become a go-to rear tire choice for a lot of riders. Generally, you wont have to do a lot of prep work on your rims to make sure theyre Ardent safe. I think it's the fastest rolling tire and has recently been adopted by most of the XC World Cup Maxxis riders. Ardent Race AUD With their lower well-placed design, the pattern rolls well too. (New annually renewing membership only. The sheer size of these tyres comes as bit of a shock. Like the Ardent, the Forekaster offers very little in the way of rolling resistance and is a quiet ride when the tires are centered. Seem to be the best combo of grip, price, durability, and weight. Ready to go tubeless, installation is a breeze, and many cyclists report that the high durability of the Ardent makes is a great rear-tire design. You mentioned that you're not looking at the 2.6 versions, but hopefully this is helpful. This new Forekaster looks almost identical to the newer Nic, just with the trademark Maxxis ramped centre tread. Please, It appears you're using an old version of Internet Explorer which is. BRL JavaScript is disabled. To help with this tires versatility, Maxxis offers it in a 2.2 or 2.35 casing. MSRP for the Forecaster 3C/EXO/TR is $85, and . When an Aspen isnt enough tire but a Minion is too much, choose the new Maxxis Forekaster.. 2020 Giant Revolt Advanced 2. Visit the high-res gallery for more images. The lightweight design and ramped knobs make this one of the faster models of tire designed for mountain trails. Theres a huuuuuge gap between an Aspen and a Minion; you can probably fit 3 tyres in that gap.and Id say Maxxis already has! When an Aspen isnt enough tire but a Minion is too much, choose the new Maxxis Forekaster. The Forekaster is Maxxis's closest to the Nic- it's tougher, and heavier, but very similiar. However, the large outer tread still performs just as well with moderate and even severe pitting, and the rubber doesnt lose reactivity or traction with wear and tear. The tread pattern is pretty unique. Rolling fast while having some nice traction, I would say the Ardent Race is right in the middle of rolling speed, traction and weight, making it very versatile. Bontrager have really hit the mark with the XR4 tyres for all round aggressive trail use. This looks like a great tire. Maxxis Forekaster Features. Forekaster - MAXXIS US We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. The Forekaster is available in 27.5 and 29 wheel diameters with widths of 2.20, 2.35, and now 2.6. Its also available in a 2.4 which wed consider as a great front tyre option for looser or sandier conditions; 2.25 out back, 2.4 up front = aggressive trail riding perfection. The tread on the Ardent resists degrading. My first trail bike came shod in Maxxis Ardent 29x2.25 with no option for tubeless. Aggressor brakes ok in dry . It's a trail tyre, through and through, sitting somewhere between the Crossmark and legendary Minion in terms of rolling speed/grip stakes. I don't know exactly how many miles it has on it probably 600 at a minimum. Calling it a Goldilocks tire, Maxxis envisions the new Forekaster as the ideal step between their current XC options and more aggressive trail and enduro tires. The Maxxis Ardent EXO is an excellent choice for the rider looking for a fast-rolling, efficient, and lightweight tire for XC style riding. product overview Come join the discussion about bike parts, components, deals, performance, modifications, classifieds, trails, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more! No complaints, wet, dry, good all around front trail use tire. Put in back and its durability and ability to take a hit really shine. If youre looking to ride loose and fast, but dont mind checking on trail conditions and taking care in sandy and muddy areas, the Ardent is a solid option. Learn how your comment data is processed. I currently use a Forekaster in the front in those wet Autumn and Winter months, and I gotta say, Ive not been impressed with it. GBP Maxxis Mounted on a 26mm inner width rim it measures out exactly 2.4" at the nobs and casing making it a respectably wide tire. I love the Ikons on the back but I am getting really tired of them washing out on the front. Marked as a 2.35, they dwarf just about all other non-downhill specific tyres out there. Do they make the Ground Control with a Gravity casing? Aggressor rolls much quicker in the dry/firm, but it is dual vrs 3C too which will have a bearing. Nice to see theyre finally offering it aftermarket in a 3C version, always annoyed me you could get the old Forekaster in 3C OE but not standalone! Slightly faster rolling speed with the same grip could have me changing to one of these new ones. CLP Originally as OE tyres in 3C trimming and latterly non-3C aftermarket. The 29er version with the durable DoubleDown casing we tested weighed 1,090 grams. Anthony Smith Maxxis classifies the Forekaster as an 'aggressive XC' tire, which seems about right: it rolls fast, and accelerates incredibly well at 735 grams for the 120tpi, EXO-casing version. Its not as wide as some trail tires, but also offers significantly less roll resistance than wider, grippier, tread designs. On my XC hardtail I've used Ardent Race (The race is a totally different tire)and Icon and Forkaster 2.6 front 2.35 rear. FWIW I mounted the Ardent Race reversed in the rear. The Rekon is made to be a bit more aggressive than the Ikon but with some additional tire tech. I guess it maybe depends on your type of wet weather. However, the tread is significantly thicker on the Minion, which is what gives it better loose soil traction. Similar post over on bikepacking.com shows an image of a Forekaster in an Exo+ casing, I wonder if those quoted weights are for the thicker casing? Maxxis Aggressor 2.3 EXO Review | Tested by GearLab That doesnt make the Ardent a worse tire, it just means that if you tend to ride loose terrain, are a particularly aggressive rider, or like coming into a corner just a little too hot, you may want to consider a tire that specializes in your riding style and conditions. The Ardent, however, covers that vast middle ground and covers it damn well. Honestly, I'd get rid of the Ardent. EUR These look good, although hard to know where it sits vs the Dissector. The 2.25 size is truly an XC tire with the low profile tread, while the 2.4 size lends itself to be more of a trail tire or a fast-rolling rear tire. They share similar terrain weaknesses but are also both highly durable options. As a front, rear, or double tire set, the Ardent is designed for moderately aggressive cyclists who like cornering at speed, but dont tend to take on trails with particularly loose soil or in highly adverse conditions.