sample opposition to attorney fees

/K [54] << /Type /StructElem /K [56] /P 668 0 R >> /P 9 0 R << /Pg 32 0 R /S /Span 111 11 /Pg 32 0 R endobj endobj /S /P /Type /StructElem cu \`2p3D|T8hr?`4X v YeH /Length 706 0 R /P 9 0 R endobj /K 16 /K [1] /Pg 31 0 R /Pg 16 0 R << /Pg 26 0 R /Pg 14 0 R /S /H1 /P 9 0 R 285 0 obj /P 35 0 R /P 238 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem endobj >> /Pg 28 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [421 0 R 422 0 R 423 0 R] /Type /StructElem endobj << << >> /S /H2 /P 607 0 R /K [1] /K [12] /Type /Page << << /Type /Page << /Tabs /S /P 9 0 R /S /P << << /P 9 0 R endobj /P 9 0 R /K [50] /Footnote /Note Attorney's fees are affected by rules covering many types of claims. 117 0 obj << endobj 211, 213-14 (N.D. Cal. /K [57] /K [19] /S /P /K 8 /Type /StructElem /Pg 32 0 R /K [51] >> >> 97 0 obj endobj 143 0 obj <> endobj << /K [31] /P 236 0 R /P 681 0 R /Annots [] << <> endobj /Annots [] /Group 576 0 R << /S /P /S /Span /K [5] >> << /K [6] endobj /S /Span << 1985); In re Fine Paper Antitrust Litig., 751 F.2d 562, 587 (3d Cir. /S /Span Motion for Attorney's Fees in California - Trellis /Tabs /S Richard Burman, Managing Partner 02Nov2020. ********************************* 3. endobj /S /H1 /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj /S /P 54 0 obj /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem 1~N1ZL2d[^@A_n-)>rgKE9|JtLO8Q`./?-jMT/51X ch! << This Court agrees, and reduces the fees outlined above by $2,618. endobj 7 0 obj /P 322 0 R /Pg 31 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem >> /S /P /Parent 6 0 R 272 0 R 273 0 R 274 0 R 275 0 R 276 0 R 277 0 R 278 0 R 279 0 R 280 0 R 281 0 R /S /Span /S /H1 /Helv 703 0 R /Pg 14 0 R /S /Span /Contents [536 0 R 537 0 R 538 0 R] >> /Pg 30 0 R endobj << >> /Type /StructElem >> endobj endobj 248 0 obj << /S /Span /S /P /K [4] /Pg 30 0 R /K [251 0 R 252 0 R 253 0 R] /Type /StructElem /S /P /P 9 0 R endobj /DR 11 0 R /Type /StructElem 450 0 obj /Pg 29 0 R /Resources 585 0 R endobj >> /P 635 0 R endobj /K [452 0 R 453 0 R 454 0 R 455 0 R] /Annots [] /Type /Page endobj T << endobj /S /P endobj /K 13 << 340 0 obj This sample opposition to a motion for an award of attorney's fees in California is used to oppose a motion for attorney's fees after a judgment has been entered on several grounds including (1) that the amount of requested attorney's fees are excessive, (2) the motion fails to provide sufficient information and (3) the judgment entered was for less than $25,000 and could have been rendered in a limited civil case. /Pg 27 0 R << Sample Opposition to Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees in California, This sample opposition to a motion for an award of attorney's fees in California is used to oppose a motion for attorney's fees after a judgment has been entered on several grounds including, 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful, 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful, Save Sample Opposition to Motion for Award of Attorney' For Later, _upmrcnr Onurt nl tbm _t`tm nl O`kclnrgc`, NUUN_CTCNG TN HNTCNG LNZ @Y@ZD NL @TTNZGMS_ LMM_, "m surm tn rmhnvm tbcs gntcom `gd `kk ntbmr gntcoms jm#nrm, bmrmcg sujhcts cts nppnsctcng tn tbm hntcng lnr `g `w`rd, ZMM*TM LMM* %ZM M5(M**)0M: T+M &T)$ L%)K* T !Z0)M *LL)()M$T, )$LZ&%T)$ ZM,%Z)$, T+M $%TZM %$ 0%KM L T+M *MZ0)(M*, )*(ZMT)$ T M$' T+M &T)$ LZ %TTZ$M' LMM* !Z*%$T T (M, `utbnrctcms, tbm dmok`r`tcng nl ^^^^^^^^^^^`gd mxbcjcts `tt`obmd tbmrmtn, ng tbm onhpkmtm lckms `gd, rmonrds nl tbcs `otcng, `gd ng suob ntbmr nr`k `gd/nr dnouhmgt`ry mvcdmgom `s h`y jm prmsmgtmd `t tbm, D`tmd^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^, sctu`tcng. /Type /StructElem /P 193 0 R <> PDF Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs >> /Type /StructElem /S /P endobj /K 15 endobj /K [20] /Pg 18 0 R >> stream /S /P >> /S /P /P 237 0 R >> 235 0 obj /K [16] /P 632 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [35] 111 0 obj<> endobj /S /P >> /S /Span /S /P /Rotate 0 /S /P /S /P /Pg 29 0 R endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 122 0 obj endobj to Save our Children v. State Bd. /Textbox /Sect /Pg 31 0 R 0 /S /P /K 19 317 0 obj /Type /StructElem << >> endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 30 0 R <> >> 374 0 obj 293 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [48] /Pg 29 0 R >> /Rotate 0 >> 373 0 obj Read Read Cited Authorities Cited Authorities 25. /S /H1 << /P 233 0 R /P 682 0 R /P 666 0 R /ITXT (2.1.7) /K [67] Dean Laing is the President of ONeil, Cannon, Hollman, DeJong & Laing S.C., and a member of its Litigation Practice Group. /P 623 0 R endobj /S /P /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem PDF 1 Table of Contents 84 0 obj /S /Span >> /S /P /Pg 31 0 R /S /H1 /Tabs /S /Pg 14 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj 423 0 obj /K 13 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 118 0 obj endobj /Pg 27 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 19 0 R endobj endobj 316 0 R] 41 0 obj << /Type /StructElem /K [296 0 R 599 0 R 600 0 R 601 0 R 602 0 R 603 0 R 604 0 R 605 0 R 606 0 R 607 0 R /S /P /S /P 203 0 R 204 0 R 205 0 R 206 0 R 207 0 R 208 0 R 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R 212 0 R /S /P /Pg 31 0 R << /K [43] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 31 0 R 393 0 R 394 0 R 395 0 R 396 0 R 397 0 R 398 0 R 399 0 R 400 0 R 401 0 R 402 0 R stream /P 9 0 R /S /P 412 0 obj << endobj << endobj /P 238 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj >> /K [6] /Type /StructElem (e.g., Code of Civ. /Pg 20 0 R /K [26] /Type /StructElem Pending before this Court is _____ Motion for Entitlement to Attorney's Fees and Costs. >> endobj /StructParents 15 /K [33] 252 0 R 253 0 R 254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R 261 0 R >> <> << In a Florida divorce proceeding, a party seeking attorney's fees usually does so under Fla. Stat. <> /S /Span endobj /Pg 31 0 R /K [0] >> /Pg 32 0 R I! /Type /StructElem Parties and attorneys must be aware that this language (i.e., the court should retain jurisdiction pursuant to CCP 664.6) is essentially meaningless when included on a settlement agreement and Request for Dismissal form on its own, as the opinion by the Court of Appeal in the case of Mesa RHF Partners, L.P. v. City of Los Angeles demonstrates. /S /P endobj /K [49] /S /P Code Civ. >> /Pg 18 0 R << 136 0 obj 255 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R /S /P << /Type /StructElem 229 0 obj 27 0 obj 40 0 obj /S /Span endobj << >> >> /K [9] >> /K 11 27 [141 0 R 142 0 R 143 0 R 144 0 R 345 0 R 346 0 R 347 0 R 348 0 R] /P 9 0 R 277 0 obj 53 0 obj /S /P /Pg 18 0 R /Pg 31 0 R 12 0 obj /ActualText ( ) Some basic discovery will need to be accomplished, which includes drafting and answering Form Interrogatories; Special Interrogatories; one productiondemand; and possibly the Petitioner's deposition. /Tabs /S /Type /StructElem /Pg 31 0 R /P 38 0 R /S /P /Pg 13 0 R /P 9 0 R /K [15] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /P 679 0 R 481 0 obj /S /P /K [638 0 R 300 0 R] /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 31 0 R /Pg 21 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /Parent 6 0 R /P 671 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /S /Span 472 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R /K [10] >> >> Because Wisconsin has not decided this issue as of yet, and other jurisdictions are split on the issue, it may be risky to oppose an opponents request for attorney fees on the grounds that the time spent by its attorneys was excessive or its attorneys hourly rates are unreasonable, particularly if it is anticipated that the attorney fees you spent likely exceed the attorney fees spent by your opponent. /P 9 0 R << /K [25] endobj 164 0 obj 422 0 obj /S /P /P 9 0 R /Pg 30 0 R /P 9 0 R endobj /P 238 0 R /K [20] endobj /S /Span << /K [31] /K [7] Opp'n at 8-9. /S /P /Pg 31 0 R >> /Pg 24 0 R /K [38] /P 663 0 R 227 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem /K [0] /Type /StructElem /K [0] 10 324 0 R 11 324 0 R 12 325 0 R 13 [69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R >> << >> HTj1}W,.+Au)$I6}I`|i]^p${w,;-9: " \\o%XP~$"\9\]q\g^={L&5el)-FNVu'}Lb}"w[j2OQ)"A\~C=4"/QpZ c>}o6. /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R 128 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R << endobj /K [27] /Type /StructElem /P 674 0 R << /Pg 14 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem << /Type /StructElem /K [34] 275 0 obj >> 55 0 obj You just lost a case in which the opposing party has a claim for attorney fees pursuant to a contract, statute or other fee-shifting mechanism. /P 9 0 R 108 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [647 0 R 314 0 R] <> 452 0 obj 258 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem /Contents [577 0 R 578 0 R 579 0 R] /Type /StructElem <> /S /Span /S /P /Resources 514 0 R /P 9 0 R /P 677 0 R Microsoft Word 2013; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT /K [6] endobj endobj /K 2 endobj 236 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R 244 0 obj /S /P 421 0 obj /Pg 32 0 R >> /Type /Catalog /S /P DOC IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11th - Florida Courts /Pg 14 0 R To view over 300 sample legal documents for sale visit: www.scribd.com/LegalDocsPro If you are a licensed attorney or law firm in need of assistance with any California or Federal litigation matters, Mr. Burman is available on a freelance basis. /Pg 32 0 R /P 237 0 R >> /Pg 32 0 R /P 9 0 R /Chart /Sect 17 0 obj 210 0 obj /K [5] << /S /P 79 0 obj >> 112 0 obj /Type /StructElem << >> /K [62] 2 317 0 R 3 318 0 R 4 319 0 R endobj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 314 0 obj 448 0 obj /P 685 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R 115 0 R 116 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R /Type /StructElem << /Pg 29 0 R 0000000945 00000 n /Header /Sect /Rotate 0 endobj /Parent 6 0 R 321 0 obj /K [13] A partys litigation expenditures reflect only the value that party has assigned to litigating the matter, which may be influenced by myriad party-specific interests. /K [44] endobj /K [14] >> Before pulling the trigger, however, you will want to consider a potential negative ramification of taking that position. >> /S /P << /Producer <4D6963726F736F6674AE20576F726420323031333B206D6F646966696564207573696E6720695465787420322E312E37206279203154335854> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /S /P /K 6 /S /Span /P 9 0 R H]K0+e"4KN&} /d 6h($>R JYRXI TN. /P 9 0 R >> /Pg 31 0 R >> /K [55] /P 676 0 R /Pg 13 0 R >> >> 392 0 obj endobj >> /P 9 0 R << >> /Type /StructElem /K [42] /P 662 0 R /Type /StructElem 262 0 R 263 0 R 264 0 R 265 0 R 266 0 R 267 0 R 268 0 R 269 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro Subscribe to his weekly newsletter with legal tips and tricks. /S /P << /Pg 18 0 R /K [54] endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 25 0 R 405 0 obj /S /P PDF Opposition to Motion for Attorneys Fees - LeFande >> >> << /K [2] 66 0 obj << /Type /StructElem HSMo@nOvwfuTUj R`%TbPcBqy3 KfnH78 X8`GX98ozo)Y)C(A:rF /P 608 0 R endobj >> 132 0 obj /S /P endobj /Pg 24 0 R /Pg 14 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 32 0 R /K [350 0 R] >> /K [4] /Group 586 0 R >> /P 9 0 R << /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R /Pg 21 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem 113 0 obj<>stream /Type /StructElem /S /Span << /Type /StructElem /Type /Page endobj /Type /StructElem /P 658 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 32 0 R /Pg 13 0 R 137 0 obj endobj << /K [13] /Pg 14 0 R You will likely need to file more than once to win your case in court. /S /P The download manager is not working as well as usual. /P 236 0 R 95 0 obj /K [21] /P 190 0 R /P 9 0 R 2017). >> /P 238 0 R endobj 1324, 1325-28 (W.D.N.Y. /K [31] /Group 566 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem 100 0 obj /P 9 0 R /S /Span >> endobj /P 598 0 R 0000000861 00000 n /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj 43 0 obj 36 0 obj 350 0 obj P. 425.16. << 71 0 obj >> Your initial reaction is to oppose the motion by arguing that the amount of time spent by the opposing party's attorneys was excessive and their hourly rates are unreasonable. << endobj /S /H1 504 0 R] /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES. /S /Span /Type /StructElem /S /P 427 0 obj /Group 477 0 R /Type /Page << /Resources 575 0 R 34 0 obj << /K [48] endobj /P 40 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] << /Pg 24 0 R /S /H2 >> Sample Opposition to Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees in California by Stan Burman on Scribd. /Pg 18 0 R /K [5] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 465 0 obj /Pg 32 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /S /P /StructParents 16 1986); Blowers v. Lawyers Coop. /P 9 0 R /K [29] /K [35] 224 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem >> << endobj LAW OFFICES OF MCNAUL EBEL NAWROT & HELGREN PLLC 600 University Street, Suite 2700 /K [12] endobj /Pg 30 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 230 0 obj /P 9 0 R << 0 c << /Group 505 0 R endobj /Pg 13 0 R << /S /Link /Filter /FlateDecode /Type /StructElem 287 0 obj /S /Span /P 9 0 R /Contents [562 0 R 563 0 R 564 0 R] /K [13] >> /Type /StructElem >> << /K [2] /K 16 << /Type /StructElem 324 0 obj << endobj endobj Id . PDF Memorandum of Costs - saclaw.org endobj /S /Span /Type /StructElem 464 0 obj /P 9 0 R /Pg 14 0 R >> endobj endobj /K [4] /S /Span /S /P If you have been served with a motion for attorney fees you should carefully review the motion and supporting documents as the California Courts of Appeal have stated that a party seeking an award of fees is not necessarily entitled to compensation for the value of attorney services for the full amount claimed. endobj << >> /P 9 0 R endobj /CS /DeviceRGB /P 232 0 R This sample opposition to a motion for attorney's fees in a California divorce is made on several grounds including that (1) the moving party has failed to meet their burden of establishing a need for the other party to pay for their . /Type /StructElem /ActualText ( ) >> LR 54 - Bill of Costs and Attorney Fees - United States District Court /K [7] report form. /P 632 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R << /Pg 18 0 R /Rotate 0 << << 416 0 obj >> 148 0 obj 143 0 R 144 0 R 145 0 R 146 0 R 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 152 0 R >> /K [456 0 R 457 0 R 458 0 R] endobj 133 0 R 134 0 R 135 0 R 136 0 R 137 0 R 138 0 R 139 0 R 140 0 R 141 0 R 142 0 R endobj /K [14] 393 0 obj /S /H1 >> feeopp8510.pdf >> /Pg 14 0 R /Contents [511 0 R 512 0 R 513 0 R] Click the on our main page to search for what you are looking for. << << /S /Span /P 631 0 R << /Type /StructElem /StructParents 29 << /Pg 24 0 R >> /K [21] << /S /P /Pg 29 0 R /Pg 14 0 R /K [21] /S /P endobj /Pg 30 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /K 28 /Type /StructElem endobj /InlineShape /Sect /Pg 31 0 R /Annots [] << /Type /StructElem 14 [84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R 86 0 R 86 0 R 86 0 R 86 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 14 0 obj /S /P /K [36] 274 0 obj /P 689 0 R <> << /K 14 /Pg 19 0 R /K [9] >> 43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R 47 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 270 0 R 271 0 R /P 191 0 R /P 625 0 R /ParentTreeNextKey 38 /P 9 0 R /S /Span << 311 0 obj /K [9] /K 21 endobj /S /P << /S /P >> endobj >> /Type /StructElem endobj /S /P /K [7] /Type /StructElem /Annots [] Objecting to an Opposing Party's Request for Attorney Fees Can Have endobj /P 9 0 R /K [41] 378 0 obj 297 0 obj >> endobj /P 9 0 R 342 0 obj /K [13] >> /K [13] << endobj /Annots [] 253 0 obj /Pg 29 0 R /K [27] /Type /StructElem /K [326 0 R 608 0 R 609 0 R] /P 9 0 R >> 323 0 obj endobj << /Resources 509 0 R >> /P 659 0 R >> 223 0 R 224 0 R 225 0 R 226 0 R 227 0 R 228 0 R 229 0 R 230 0 R 231 0 R 232 0 R /S /Span << /Pg 31 0 R /Parent 6 0 R /Pg 31 0 R << >> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> 380 0 R 381 0 R 382 0 R] << endobj /Type /StructElem 313 0 obj /P 9 0 R /ActualText (-) /S /P >> 173 0 R 174 0 R 175 0 R 176 0 R] /Encoding 475 0 R /P 612 0 R /Type /Page /Length 12 0 R endobj /K [615 0 R 616 0 R 617 0 R 618 0 R 619 0 R 620 0 R 621 0 R 622 0 R] /K [9] /P 193 0 R 259264) Zuilenstraat 23 3512NB Utrecht The Netherlands Telephone: +31 06 51471575 Email: jweiner.envlaw@gmail.com John Rose (CA Bar No. /K [17] /Pg 31 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /P 604 0 R >> >> endobj /P 701 0 R /Pg 20 0 R << /Type /StructElem >> /P 9 0 R /Pg 13 0 R <> /K [10] /Pg 19 0 R 310 0 obj /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /P 610 0 R /S /Span /Pg 31 0 R /Type /StructElem 49 0 obj 414 0 obj x+ | endobj /S /Span /Pg 31 0 R /Pg 14 0 R /Pg 30 0 R HK0sWZ]RXm /Pg 31 0 R /K [448 0 R 449 0 R] endobj /Filter /FlateDecode /P 9 0 R << << /Pg 14 0 R ~6W[!!$)J+A:LS p!/o=$E^"S|NLFZ8L@9d^W?}-TUGpx-7DEjZ?pI3cqw vZN]U#NWw3>R4`$4)9?vS5;s$#%V]S?r5Lcgs^91@. >> /P 9 0 R /Pg 16 0 R << /P 613 0 R /S /H1 If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. /P 194 0 R << 356 0 obj /StructParents 31 /ActualText (540) /P 9 0 R /Creator <4D6963726F736F6674AE20576F72642032303133> /Type /StructElem 354 0 obj freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/ DISCLAIMER: Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. endobj /Rotate 0 /Type /StructElem /S /P /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R /S /Span A California Court of Appeal stated in a published case that when making a determination whether the prevailing party recovered a judgment that could have been rendered in a court of lesser jurisdiction, the trial court does not add a potential award of statutory or contractual attorney's fees. << /P 667 0 R /K 7 /S /Span /Type /StructElem Procedure (4th ed. endobj 385 0 obj endobj Ohio 2003) ("Attorneys fees and costs are matters traditionally reserved for court determination" and "contractual fee-shifting provision for reimbursement [of fees] /K 9 56 0 obj Absent a fee-shifting claim, a partys attorney-fee expenditures need not be reasonable or necessary for the particular case. endobj << << /Pg 13 0 R /K [52] /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R 482 0 obj /Parent 6 0 R >> << << /P 690 0 R 338 0 obj 362 0 obj /K [10] /P 9 0 R /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem Proc., 425.16 (c) ("a prevailing defendant on [an anti-SLAPP motion] shall be entitled to recover his or her attorney's fees and costs."); Cal. /K [10] /Contents [557 0 R 558 0 R 559 0 R] >> << 130 0 obj >> /S /Span << >> 82 0 obj /P 9 0 R << ********************************* 4. /S /Span /K 4 5 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem The opposition to a motion for attorney fees in California should be served and filed at least nine (9) court days before the hearing. /Type /StructElem endobj << /S /P /Pg 28 0 R /K [31] /Type /StructElem /S /P /Contents [592 0 R 593 0 R 594 0 R] endobj /P 9 0 R /P 9 0 R /S /Span /Pg 13 0 R Search Instructions. /Pg 23 0 R << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> /Pg 31 0 R 1992); Real v. Contl Grp., Inc., 116 F.R.D. <> << << 9*R^+9Ni -Q\Is?5GuyI+9JM69umE|U.:g|M~8>%IHl38ZH5eh*R2MdXa#b/ /S /P 196 0 obj /P 193 0 R >> >> /Type /StructElem >> endobj <]>> See, e.g., Henson v. Columbus Bank & Tr. /Rotate 0 /S /P /Type /StructElem LeFande filed a timely opposition. 129 0 obj 25 0 obj /K [1] << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K 10 /S /Span /S /P /P 39 0 R /Pg 18 0 R /Pg 18 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P /K [27] /S /H1 >> endobj /Type /StructElem /K [22] The majority of courts hold that discovery of an objecting partys attorney fees is permissible under these circumstances. /Pg 27 0 R endobj /S /H1 /Type /StructElem >> PDF SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Both motions for /S /Link /K [642 0 R 306 0 R] /P 9 0 R >> 147 0 obj /S /P /K [1] /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Pg 31 0 R /S /P >> endobj /Type /StructElem at 53. /ActualText (672) 151 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R >> /Pg 31 0 R >> << << /Pg 14 0 R 461 0 R 462 0 R 463 0 R 464 0 R 465 0 R 466 0 R 467 0 R 468 0 R 469 0 R 470 0 R /DA (/Helv 0 Tf 0 g ) 476 0 obj /K [61] /P 9 0 R /K [10] /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R /Tabs /S /Contents [546 0 R 547 0 R 548 0 R] << 0000000516 00000 n 246 0 obj 339 0 obj 183 0 obj << /K [23] /Resources 555 0 R <> endobj /Pg 16 0 R /S /P /K [29] /Pg 32 0 R /P 235 0 R 62sg{p.XWrdCnFOaZ+Jw"dmv6KY[d*nF6Ijw\cs*/S2$O3c0_I|y_zXE!fla475(he9}c0 p5iPew+:AQwnpk{YT6 (j?zXTW=!==sdV+C.5 MJ#RHIl|"qg:b8 8Ts`T|Qe$N9Q:0l8d~IjUc'c+aVU.T;#puAPJ-*+=[ A.Z+n\ KU=}/rqR:b3_log6=c Izrx Y <> /Fields [] >> endobj endobj /S /P endobj /Group 540 0 R /S /P /K [1] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /P 660 0 R Sample Briefs & Motions - Oregon Judicial Department F$)1]m~&|998 *D|bsCgRE51 e|0i{i/1Qz% /P 9 0 R << endobj /Type /StructElem 159 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R /S /Span endobj /S /Span >> <> << /S /Span /Pg 13 0 R << 371 0 obj 1978); Vulcan Materials Co. v. Chandler, 992 So. >> 153 0 obj /K [0] o Scotts Co. v. Cent.Garden & Pet Co ., 256 F. Supp. >> /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem << 28 349 0 R 29 [146 0 R 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R] /P 631 0 R >> /Type /StructElem >> /Type /StructElem endobj /Type /StructElem /P 191 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /K [14] /Pg 13 0 R 477 0 obj 261 0 obj 431 0 obj /Type /StructElem /P 233 0 R endobj >> /S /Link /Pg 30 0 R endobj endobj /K [43] /StructParents 19 /S /P 167 0 obj /Type /StructElem << >> /Type /StructElem /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj >> /P 9 0 R >> The opposition to a motion for attorney fees in California should be served and filed at least nine (9) court days before the hearing. endobj /S /Span 47 0 obj << 4. 115 0 obj /Type /StructElem 279 0 obj << /K [24] /Type /StructElem /P 614 0 R /Type /StructElem << /Type /StructElem /S /Span 296 0 obj 295 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R << 451 0 obj 400 0 obj >> The opposing party has now filed a motion for attorney fees. /Pg 31 0 R 160 0 obj >> /K [11] /S /P Under Fla. R. Civ. >> /P 9 0 R /S /Span 80 0 obj endstream endobj 112 0 obj<> endobj 114 0 obj<> endobj 115 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 116 0 obj<> endobj 117 0 obj<> endobj 118 0 obj<> endobj 119 0 obj<> endobj 120 0 obj<> endobj 121 0 obj<>stream /Pg 29 0 R /K [15] /Type /StructElem /S /Span 386 0 obj 398 0 obj /K [2] endobj /Type /StructElem endobj >> /P 349 0 R /K [7] /Pg 13 0 R << /S /Span /K [3] Numerous other cases hold the same way. PDF Plaintiffs opposition to Jess Rowland request for attorneys fees /Pg 17 0 R /Type /StructElem 96 0 obj /S /P 282 0 R 283 0 R 284 0 R 285 0 R 286 0 R 287 0 R 288 0 R 289 0 R 290 0 R 291 0 R /Tabs /S /P 9 0 R << >> << endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 13 0 R >> /Pg 31 0 R /Chartsheet /Part >> /Type /StructElem /P 191 0 R /Type /StructElem << >> >> /Pg 27 0 R 446 0 obj endobj endobj >> >> 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 endobj /Type /StructElem 163 0 obj /Contents [541 0 R 542 0 R 543 0 R] /Pg 31 0 R 58 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj DuPont De Nemours & Co., 2004 WL 784489, at *3 (W.D. << endobj /Resources 570 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /K [3] /P 188 0 R /P 615 0 R /S /P /Pg 29 0 R /K [17] endobj /Type /StructElem /K [25] /S /P /K [49] /Type /Page /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem /K 11 >> /Type /StructElem /S /P /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /S /Span 36 [186 0 R 187 0 R 410 0 R 411 0 R 412 0 R 413 0 R 414 0 R 415 0 R 416 0 R 417 0 R << /Type /StructElem << /Resources 580 0 R >> /K [35] 103 0 obj << 175 0 obj /P 9 0 R %%EOF endobj /K [32] endobj /Annots [494 0 R 495 0 R 496 0 R 497 0 R 498 0 R 499 0 R 500 0 R 501 0 R 502 0 R 503 0 R 239 0 obj endobj /K [13] endobj >> stream Your initial reaction is to oppose the motion by arguing that the amount of time spent by the opposing partys attorneys was excessive and their hourly rates are unreasonable. /S /P /P 9 0 R << /K [27] << >> << 140 0 obj Please bear with us as the download emails don't seem to be getting sent out as quickly right now. << /Diagram /Figure >> /Pg 29 0 R /Pg 29 0 R /P 9 0 R << /Type /StructElem << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /P 189 0 R /S /P 221 0 obj They are currently arriving within 30 minutes of purchase. /P 9 0 R /S /Table /P 9 0 R /S /P 468 0 obj 334 0 obj attorney's fees and costs under Section 362(k)(1) are awarded in an amount to be determined by the court. 407 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /Link endobj /Type /StructElem /Resources 519 0 R /K [13] 327 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 20 0 R /K [645 0 R 646 0 R 312 0 R] /Tabs /S >> 206 0 obj 178 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Pg 14 0 R /K [0] /Type /Page >> endobj /Pg 30 0 R /Type /StructElem /K 7 /Marked true /P 632 0 R <> >> >> %PDF-1.4 % /Type /StructElem endobj /Resources 549 0 R /Pg 19 0 R /K [1] /P 9 0 R >> << endobj /S /P /K 4 370 0 R 371 0 R 372 0 R 373 0 R 374 0 R 375 0 R 376 0 R 377 0 R 378 0 R 379 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R /Pg 31 0 R << /S /P /Pg 26 0 R /Annots [] /S /P >> /S /P endobj >> /Type /StructElem >> << /S /P /K [0] 333 0 obj 188 0 obj xref 135 0 obj /S /P /P 614 0 R Report DMCA endobj /Type /StructElem 443 0 obj endobj /S /P >> 156 0 obj /Pg 29 0 R << >> startxref /K [18] /Type /StructElem /K [31] /S /Span 328 0 obj /P 9 0 R /S /P /S /P /K [16] /S /Span 3d 108, 113 (W.D.N.Y. /K [15] 399 0 obj /K [254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R] /Pg 18 0 R n $T 7ust usm tbm wnrdcgi bmrm ugkmss ct, tn ynur p`rtcouk`r sctu`tcng. 470 0 obj << /P 192 0 R /S /P /K [2] /K [473 0 R 474 0 R] << 94 0 obj /K [17] /K [2] /Type /StructElem /P 695 0 R 73 0 obj << /K [8] /Type /StructElem /Pg 31 0 R /S /Span /S /P /P 633 0 R 389 0 obj /S /P /Pg 27 0 R A minority of courts go the other way, holding that what an objecting party paid in attorney fees to defend a case is not relevant on the issue of whether what the plaintiff paid to prosecute the case is reasonable. /Pg 30 0 R 338 0 R 339 0 R 340 0 R 341 0 R 342 0 R 343 0 R 344 0 R] /P 634 0 R 177 0 obj /S /Span /Type /StructElem /Pg 31 0 R /Pg 13 0 R << The author is a freelance paralegal that has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995. 231 0 obj << /K [614 0 R 348 0 R] /StructParents 34 >> << endobj 34 [180 0 R 351 0 R 352 0 R 353 0 R 354 0 R 355 0 R 356 0 R 357 0 R 358 0 R 359 0 R /K [11] Under the so-called "American Rule," parties to litigation must pay their ownattorney fees despite prevailing in the litigation.1 California courts have long followed theRule, and it has been codified in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021, whichprovides that, in the absence of a statute or contract, prevailing litigants are entitled /K [2] >> /Type /StructElem << /P 606 0 R /Pg 18 0 R /K [12] /K [11] /S /H1 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R 106 0 R 107 0 R 108 0 R 109 0 R 110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R As one court held, the defendants fees may provide the best available comparable standard to measure the reasonableness of plaintiffs expenditures in litigating the issues of the case. Chicago Profl Sports Ltd. Pship v. Natl Basketball Assn, 1996 WL 66111, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 13, 1996). /Type /StructElem 270 0 obj Thornton v. J Jargon Co. et al | MEMORANDUM in opposition re - Casetext << >> 219 0 obj /P 9 0 R /Group 510 0 R 88 0 obj /S /Span /ActualText (3055) /Pg 32 0 R /P 190 0 R 195 0 obj /StructParents 0 This Court agrees, and reduces the fees outlined above by $10,876. See Opposition at 4:20 to 13:3. /K [23] /P 701 0 R /Length 712 0 R >> endobj << 31 0 obj /K [29] /P 632 0 R >>

sample opposition to attorney fees 2023